Editorial policy
Editorial review and responsible astrology
Who is responsible for a page, how AI assistance is reviewed, and which claims we will not publish.Our goal is clear, useful astrology content with visible limits. We avoid fear-based certainty, fabricated authority, and advice that substitutes for professional care.Last updated · Aug 24, 2026Who, how, and why
Public articles name an author or the AstroMaster editorial team, show a publication date, and add a revision date after material changes. Each page explains its purpose and links to the relevant calculation or source policy.
- Who: a named contributor or an accountable editorial team.
- How: calculation, source research, editorial drafting, and any AI assistance.
- Why: education, reflection, or explaining a tool—not manipulating search rankings.
Review checklist
Before publishing, editors check terminology, internal consistency, what each source is used for, links, dates, uncertainty, and the line between chart facts and interpretation.
- No guaranteed outcomes or fabricated precision.
- No medical, legal, financial, or mental-health diagnosis.
- No claims that a chart overrides personal choice or consent.
- No invented sources, credentials, testimonials, or data records.
AI assistance
AI may help with outlines, translation, consistency checks, or first drafts. Authoritative content still requires a human-defined method, validated structured data, and editorial review.
- AI is never credited as an expert source.
- Automated forecasts must be anchored to actual calculated sky data.
- Pages published at scale must add real value and are monitored for repetition and factual drift.
Sensitive topics
Astrology can prompt reflection, but it's no substitute for emergency help or professional advice. Content about health, money, law, harm, self-harm, or personal safety uses stricter limits and points to where to get help.